Comments on: More On The IFF’s Folly http://utahfeldenkrais.org/blog/2010/04/the-iffs-folly/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-iffs-folly The Work of Dr. Moshe Feldenkrais is Alive and Well: Everywhere Wed, 25 Apr 2012 21:38:20 +0000 hourly 1 By: Eva Laser http://utahfeldenkrais.org/blog/2010/04/the-iffs-folly/comment-page-1/#comment-22300 Eva Laser Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:45:47 +0000 http://utahfeldenkrais.org/blog/?p=2496#comment-22300 Thank you Ryan. As we know both the San Fransisco & Amherst were recorded. At that time IFF did not exist, it was founded in 1992. The forms if any can not be signed as one party by them. We know also that the videos from Amherst have been used for many years in trainings with or without these forms. I can understand it being looked at different in a closed setting or the open web. I have not heard yet how much video material there is from SF or if it is only audio material. As a practitioner you can buy some of the SF recordings from 1975. This is an extract from the minutes of the 1993 IFF assembly if you haven't seen them. "7.5 Reported by the President that negotiations were continuing with the Feldenkrais Foundation concerning Moshe's Amherst training and functional integration videotapes. He stressed the importance of making materials available to all members of the Feldenkrais community at the lowest possible price." You find the material at the IFF site. The openness of the processes of decision makings is somehow the threshold of institutions like this. Many aspects to consider. // Eva Thank you Ryan. As we know both the San Fransisco & Amherst were recorded. At that time IFF did not exist, it was founded in 1992. The forms if any can not be signed as one party by them. We know also that the videos from Amherst have been used for many years in trainings with or without these forms. I can understand it being looked at different in a closed setting or the open web.
I have not heard yet how much video material there is from SF or if it is only audio material. As a practitioner you can buy some of the SF recordings from 1975.
This is an extract from the minutes of the 1993 IFF assembly if you haven’t seen them.
“7.5 Reported by the President that negotiations were continuing with the Feldenkrais Foundation concerning Moshe’s Amherst training and functional integration videotapes. He stressed the importance of making materials available to all members of the Feldenkrais community at the lowest possible price.”
You find the material at the IFF site.
The openness of the processes of decision makings is somehow the threshold of institutions like this. Many aspects to consider.
//
Eva

]]> By: nagster http://utahfeldenkrais.org/blog/2010/04/the-iffs-folly/comment-page-1/#comment-22295 nagster Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:00:57 +0000 http://utahfeldenkrais.org/blog/?p=2496#comment-22295 Hi Eva - In general they are short legal documents letting someone know that an event is being recorded and that the recording might be sold or played publicly later. I have signed many such forms before. Here is a good overview of them: <a href="http://www.webvideozone.com/public/88.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.webvideozone.com/public/88.cfm</a> I have never seen the release form from the IFF, nor do I know if one was signed by participants. I don't think anyone there will show us a copy. - Ryan Hi Eva – In general they are short legal documents letting someone know that an event is being recorded and that the recording might be sold or played publicly later. I have signed many such forms before. Here is a good overview of them: http://www.webvideozone.com/public/88.cfm

I have never seen the release form from the IFF, nor do I know if one was signed by participants. I don’t think anyone there will show us a copy.

- Ryan

]]> By: Eva Laser http://utahfeldenkrais.org/blog/2010/04/the-iffs-folly/comment-page-1/#comment-22293 Eva Laser Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:00:35 +0000 http://utahfeldenkrais.org/blog/?p=2496#comment-22293 Ryan Rob Black is mentioning "5. The video recordings at Amherst did not have the kind of release permissions that are current in this day. Consequently we do not have permission to share images of people at Amherst other than Dr. Feldenkrais. This “sharing” includes still stills and video;" Do you have any information in general about such release permissions? What is it and how shall it be understood? I have asked around and I have not got any clarifying answer. Could you help me out? What is implied and what does it mean. // Eva Ryan
Rob Black is mentioning
“5. The video recordings at Amherst did not have the kind of release permissions that are current in this day. Consequently we do not have permission to share images of people at Amherst other than Dr. Feldenkrais. This “sharing” includes still stills and video;”
Do you have any information in general about such release permissions? What is it and how shall it be understood? I have asked around and I have not got any clarifying answer. Could you help me out? What is implied and what does it mean.
//
Eva

]]>