David Bersin: “Moshe Feldenkrais Is In The Room With Me.”

Posted by nagster on August 3, 2011 in David Bersin, David Zemach-Bersin, feldenkrais, Feldenkrais Institute
4 Comments

Last week, I got a marketing email from David Zemach Bersin about his next training program in New York. Bersin leads the email with a quote from one of his students:

“When David is in the room, I get a sense that Dr. Feldenkrais is right there with him. It’s an incredible experience.”

In other words, David’s biggest claim to fame is not who he is a person and what he has done himself but his relationship to a dead man. Don’t go to Bersin’s Feldenkrais training to learn the work. Go to be near Moshe.

For those of you who read this blog on a regular basis, David’s desire to be seen as close to Moshe should come as no surprise. As I demonstrated in an earlier blog post, “Moshe Feldenkrais Had No Interest In The Guild“, David Bersin has been claiming for many years that he represents Moshe Feldenkrais. Apart from the fact that Moshe is DEAD (gasp!), there is no historical evidence to bolster David’s claim about what Moshe wanted. And David claims to have been a close personal associate of Moshe Feldenkrais for 12 years. That is simply untrue.

In Bersin’s marketing email he also claims that his trainings “exceed the highest standards set by the Feldenkrais Guild.” That does indeed sound wonderful. Unless you know that Feldenkrais Guild standards have nothing to do with training competency nor becoming competent in the work. They are rule-based standards and focus on meaningless indicators such as the number of training hours per day, how many trainers and assistant trainers need to be in the room and the like.

As I and many others have noted, Guild trainings have no known efficacy in helping people to launch careers in the feldenkrais method. (See: Feldenkrais Trainings: How Many Practitioners Start A Practice?). As for working with David Bersin? Here’s what a recent graduate had to say:

If I could talk to people thinking of enrolling in his training, I would encourage them to ask him for references of people who went through the training and are doing this work for a living (a reasonable request). David might be able to give you a few PT’s or massage therapists who now give some lessons (or some students who now answer his phones and give lessons at the institute, barely scraping by), but there won’t be more than a handful. Given the hundreds of people he’s trained over all these years, it’s a powerful indictment that so few of them actually have developed the skills to do this work professionally.

If you are interested in some of my own experiences in working with him, let me direct you to: “David Bersin and the Advanced Workshop That Wasn’t

I wish I could close this blog post with some simple advice. I wish I had some type of easy formula that you could use to learn the work and to find a quality training. I don’t. All that I can say right now is “Buyer Beware.” Spend as much time as you can doing the work on your own through recorded sessions and transcripts. Read Moshe’s work. And experience a broad range of styles until you feel ready commit to a training. My hope is that rational and quality Feldenkrais trainings will begin to be the norm and not the exception. But much work has to be done before that becomes the case.

Tags: , ,

Peggy LaCerra On Martin Weiner’s Death.

Posted by nagster on July 9, 2011 in feldenkrais, marty weiner
3 Comments

Approximately two months ago I wrote a short article on Marty Weiner and his death. Peggy LaCerra who was Marty’s partner for many years wrote a comment on the article and also shared her eulogy of Marty. Her writing has helped me create a clearer picture of Marty and his life and death. Perhaps it will do the same for you. I asked Peggy if I could re-post the entire comment as a blog post and she graciously agreed.

 


 

Thanks for your remembrance of Marty Weiner. There has been so much speculation about why Marty took his life, not to mention judgment about his decision, that I want to share my perspective. Marty had struggled for many years with the pain that invoked his suicidal ideation — it was the same pain that formed and fueled his genius as a healer and an artist, and this past April, he decided to release himself from it.

I lived with Marty for almost 9 years, and there were times that his pain was too much to bear for me; I can only imagine what it was for him. Yet, people came to him from far and wide with their physical and psychological burdens, and he transformed them with his touch and his words; others — many of them Feldenkrais practioners, students of ‘consciousness’, former clients and people who had simply heard tales of his abilities — came simply to hear him share his knowledge and wisdom. He carried on, sharing his gifts with others, in the face of his personal anguish, day after day, year after year, until his own pain was too much for him to take. From my privileged perspective, his path was nothing less than spiritually noble. Here was my eulogy for him:

When I heard the news of Marty’s death, I grieved deeply the loss of this exceptional man, whom I had loved dearly, and who had been my life partner for 9 years. My heart broke sensing what I felt might have been his final moments of anguish and fear, and with the realization that my last moments with him were to be those gray and painful ones that I had spent preparing to leave our temple home for the last time.

For the moment, I had forgotten the central point of his brilliant philosophy of life, and healing, and art. As most of you know, in addition to being an artist, Marty was a teacher and practitioner of a unique hands-on healing method, as well as a philosophy of conscious experience.

His approach to healing the bodies, minds and spirits of others is perhaps best captured by a beautiful Galway Kinnell poem, which he kept framed in his treatment room. It is called “St. Francis and the Sow”:

The bud
stands for all things,
even those things that don’t flower,
for everything flowers, from within, of self-blessing;
though sometimes it is necessary
to reteach a thing its loveliness,
to put a hand on its brow
of the flower
and retell it in words and in touch
it is lovely
until it flowers again from within, of self-blessing;
as St. Francis
put his hand on the creased forehead
of the sow, and told her in words and in touch
blessings of earth on the sow, and the sow
began remembering all down her thick length,
from the earthen snout all the way
through the fodder and slops to the spiritual curl of
the tail,
from the hard spininess spiked out from the spine
down through the great broken heart
to the blue milken dreaminess spurting and shuddering
from the fourteen teats into the fourteen mouths sucking
and blowing beneath them:
the long, perfect loveliness of sow.

Marty saw everyone he touched as a beautiful and whole work of art – regardless of their medically-diagnosed conditions or personal sense of imperfection, and his lessons showed us new and more expansive ways of being, of experiencing our own wholeness.

To hear the words he told us, about us and to be held in his healing hands was to be ‘reminded’ of our own perfect loveliness, to feel our own ‘self-blessing’, perhaps for the first time.

But it was his private sense of irreversible imperfection and its attendant anguish that fueled his genius and every aspect of his life’s work.

At the age of 6, Marty was diagnosed with a spinal tumor and admitted to Massachusetts General Hospital for a series of radiation treatments that would disintegrate his vertebrae in the region of the lesion, and require him to be in a full-body cast for six months, and on crutches for another year.

His parents lived across the city from the hospital and didn’t have a car. They had four children, all told, with another small child at home to care for, and jobs to do . . . And so Marty was left alone, sometimes for days and nights at a time, in a dreary ward (which was characteristic of large municipal hospitals in the 1940s), with only rare visits from the professional-but-impersonal medical staff – left alone with his extreme physical pain, and his absolute immobility, and an excruciating sense of his own imperfection.

This nightmarish experience was the seed of the bud that blossomed fully into Marty’s extraordinary healing talent, a talent that touched the lives of heads of state and industry, celebrities and star athletes, homeless persons and immigrant children with equal tenderness and love.

The demons of his early experiences never left him; rather, they remained as his ever-present teachers, and his private struggle with them continued to fuel his powerful healing talents, his art, and his philosophy of life until he made the decision to end his own.

Now, as I remember Marty and his core teachings, I see clearly the whole masterwork of impressionistic art that was his life.

We can neither appreciate it, nor understand it by stepping in close and focusing on any one moment, dark or bright, and it is not in anyway diminished because the last dab of paint applied to the canvas appears to us gray rather than robins-egg blue.

For us to see Marty’s last moment as a ‘senseless tragedy’, or his life as ‘imperfect’ or ‘distorted’ because of it, would be to miss the genius of his central teaching and the exquisite beauty and absolute perfection of the whole being that was, and is, Marty Weiner.

 


 

If you want to know more about Peggy you can find her at: The Center for Evolutionary Neuroscience. There are two pages on her website that I find particularly fascinating: Intentional Self Creation and The Mind is For Movement. Peggy is an accomplished researcher and author and wrote the book The Origin of Minds: Evolution, Uniqueness, and the New Science of the Self which you might find quite fascinating.

Moshe Feldenkrais The Imposter

Posted by nagster on July 7, 2011 in feldenkrais, moshe feldenkrais
8 Comments

What is the weird fascination with Moshe Feldenkrais within the so-called “Feldenkrais Community”? I find it rather odd – even offensive – that his ideas are given so much weight. Moshe Feldenkrais was neither a Guild Certified Feldenkrais Practitioner® nor a Feldenkrais Trainer. He never graduated from a Guild Certified training nor did he meet the requirements for becoming a trainer. Can anyone show me a copy of his certificate? Can anyone show me his trainer application or show me the signatures of those who supposedly “approved” his status as a trainer? You can’t show them to me because they don’t exist. The idea of him being a trainer or practitioner is total nonsense. He was neither. Give it a rest. Quit talking about him. I for one I am tired hearing about the old fool.

And for those you who want to quote him as either for or against a certain policy in the guild or elsewhere, let me just say: “Stop it! Shut up.” I mean that – shut up. Moshe Feldenkrais simply is not one of us. He never was and never will be. Any thoughts that you may have to the contrary are completely delusional. And no, that is not a joke. If you think Moshe was a Feldenkrais practitioner or trainer, you are deeply confused. Pull your head out of your rear end and come up for air. You might learn something about the world and the nature of the work that you say you do.




Moshe Feldenkrais: Viewing Moshe With A Fresh Pair of Eyes.

Posted by nagster on July 5, 2011 in feldenkrais, moshe feldenkrais
Closed

Thanks to a posting by Deborah Elizabeth Lotus on Facebook, I found a recent online article about Moshe Feldenkrais in Tablet Magazine. The article benefits greatly from being written and researched by someone new to the work. I will not add any commentary, but highly recommend the article: Moshe Feldenkrais History




Tags:

Barret Dorko on Pain: Painful Problems Are Not Concrete

Posted by nagster on June 23, 2011 in feldenkrais
11 Comments

From “Dorko’s Diamonds”

I have to admit that I am not as familiar with Barrett Dorko’s work as I would like to be. But over the years I have found his essays and thoughts quite provocative. I first heard of Barret when Feldenkrais “Trainer” Reuven Ofir (Robbie Ofir)¹ made a post about him on the FeldyForum.²

One of the reasons that I like Dorko so much is his willingness to engage in a quest for more useful solutions when dissatisfied with the current answers in his field. In my view, he is doing what Feldenkrais did. He is using his scientific knowledge and his curiosity to engage in his own process of learning and development – irrespective of the ideology and dogma of a particular professional organization.

In the short video below, Barrett begins explaining how painful problems are not concrete and do not necessarily have a linear, apriori “cause” to which one can point – even though therapists and scientists of many sorts would love to think they can…

The video will not provide an “answer” for getting out of pain, but it is the beginning of some useful questions about how to think about the issues involved.

There is a discussion of the video on a forum that Barret moderates on SomaSimple.

I also recommend taking a look a demonstration of Barret’s “hands” on work on YouTube: Simple Contact.

Notes:
1. Reuven call himself a “Feldenkrais Trainer” but I like him anyway.
2. Proof that even the FeldyForum can be useful on occasion.

Copyright © 2006-2012 Feldenkrais. Commentary on Feldenkrais Worldwide All rights reserved.
Shades v1.5.1 theme from BuyNowShop.com.